Less is more: The Supreme Court should not decide immunity ‘for the ages’ 

News
0
Please log in or register to do it.


After listening to two and half hours of oral argument in the Donald Trump immunity case, it is perfectly clear what the Supreme Court should decide: namely, as little as possible.  

In other words, the Supreme Court should set a different tack for themselves than making an immunity decision “for the ages,” as Justice Neil Gorsuch suggested. Instead, the court should keep it simple, treat the Trump immunity decision as the easy “non-official” electioneering case that it is and avoid making a definitive, complicated and time-consuming ruling on presidential immunity to address…



Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Saudi Arabia's non-oil business activity growth steady in April-PMI By Reuters
Helpers escort kids through San Francisco's broken Tenderloin streets